A Critical Assessment of the Predominant HR Cultural and Institutional Term Paper

A Critical Assessment of the Predominant HR Cultural and Institutional Features in Germany and the UK - Term typography ExampleThe collective cultural dimensions are what drive either corporatist philosophy or neo-liberal policies. The UK institution is founded on neo-liberal principles which involve more consensus and shared decision-making whilst German institutions obey a more stringent corporatist philosophy. The extent and composition of HR strategies in some(prenominal) countries are strongly influenced by these evolutions that have occurred historically due to changes in society, business, and government.This essay seeks to examine the most critical cultural characteristics within Germany and the UK that influence the development of HR policy. The objective is to provide a critical comparison of both cultures as it relates to institutional philosophy, taking into consideration a variety of mitigating institutional features that predict positive HR performance or conflict us ing a respected cultural model (such as Hofstedes Cultural Dimensions framework) as a guiding source for HR development. The essay focuses primarily on personal identicalness versus collectivism and the influence of tolerance for power distance in both countries from an institutional perspective to determine their disparate or congruent human resources policies and practices. cultivation in the United Kingdom is dominantly individualistic. Individualism is considered a type of cultural characteristic in which the predominant values are ensuring well-being and utility for the self-importance or direct kin in a traditional nuclear family context (Hofstede, Hofstede and Minkov 2010 Hollinshead 2009 Hofstede 2001 Hofstede 1984). Individualists seek opportunities for unique self-expression and, oftentimes, these needs and beliefs manifest themselves in how the individual views their identity within the organization with many inherent demands for recognition for individual accomplishmen t.